
Emploi : comprendre les enjeux actuels et leurs impacts sur le grand public
Face à un marché du travail en mutation, cet article décortique les…
\
🆕 Mise à jour : contenu reformaté et actualisé. A Short Summary of Federal Grants What is a grant? A grant is a way the government funds your…
🆕 Mise à jour : contenu reformaté et actualisé.
What is a grant? A grant is a way the government funds your ideas and projects to provide public services and stimulate the economy. Grants support critical recovery initiatives, innovative research, and many other programs listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA).
A grant is one of many different forms of federal financial assistance. Federal financial assistance is a broad term to refer to the various ways the U.S. government redistributes resources to eligible recipients. On Grants.gov you will find grant and cooperative agreement opportunities from federal agencies that award grants.
Bons Plans : Astuces Data Mobile pour le Grand Public Francophone
Deepfake : Comment s’en Protéger
Tutoriel complet pour la formation à ChatGPT
Shadowban : Mythe ou Réalité ?
Les Meilleures Applications de Cashback : Astuces, Comparatifs et Conseils de Sécurité
Explication d’actualité : C’est quoi une eSIM ?
The grant process follows a linear lifecycle that includes creating the funding opportunity, applying, making award decisions, and successfully implementing the award. Check out the Grant Lifecycle page to find out what the applicant and the grant-making agency do in the lifecycle.
The specific actions along the lifecycle are grouped into three main phases. Each of the three phases has its own page that provides a more detailed look at the process:
The pre-award phase represents the beginning of the grant lifecycle, which includes announcing opportunities, submitting applications, and reviewing applications. Below are explanations of what generally occurs during the pre-award phase.
Both the grant-making agencies and prospective applicants conduct their planning processes. The awarding agencies prepare and publish Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOA) based on the related legislation and their budget.
An FOA includes all the pertinent information and requirements for an applicant to assess their eligibility, competency, and interest in the funding opportunity. How do you find these opportunities? That’s where Grants.gov comes in.
You, a prospective applicant, can use the Search Grants function to navigate through opportunities and settle on the right FOA for you. Once you select on a funding opportunity to apply for, there are two high-level steps, in addition to your own application development processes, to work on before submitting your application in Grants.gov:
Registering to apply for grants on Grants.gov includes several steps and types of registration, including DUNS, SAM.gov, and Grants.gov accounts. We have pages dedicated to walking you through the Applicant Registration processes under the Applicants tab. It’s not a highly complex process, but it can take 1 to 3 weeks to complete, so please register as early as you can. Do not allow yourself to miss the application deadline because you waited until the last week to try to register.
Before jumping into the process of filling out the application, you (i.e., an organization or individual) should spend time analyzing your own capabilities as compared to the specific eligibility and technical requirements detailed in the application instructions. The application planning process is lengthy, but it is critical when considering the importance of carrying out government-related work and the competition you may face for funding. While the specific steps vary widely depending on the type of grant you are applying for, major components of the planning process includes developing your ideas, conducting research, writing your proposal, and completing the application in Grants.gov.
If you are interested in more specific information or training on the development of an effective proposal, there are a number of options out there. First, we recommend perusing the awarding agencies website. Often, the awarding agency provides specific information on pre-award processes pertaining to their types of funding opportunities. Next, we also recommend looking at the Grants.gov Community Blog for additional information and upcoming grant events from across the grants world.
Once the application submission deadline passes, the awarding agencies get to work reviewing the applications. The specific process for reviewing an application varies based on the type of grant you applied for. The generally applicable steps are as follows:
In the initial screening, sometimes called a basic minimum requirements review, the agencies will check each proposal to ensure it includes all the required elements to qualify for the grant. What the specific requirements are will vary for each grant, but common elements are eligibility, program narrative, and budget attachment. The key for the initial screening is that the agencies are looking for the presence of the required element, not the quality of the element. If your application does not meet all of these basic requirements, then your application is likely to be rejected.
The remaining applications undergo a thorough review and assessment for their technical and programmatic quality and competency. Again, this varies depending on the type of grant you applied for. For discretionary grants, the review is conducted by independent experts who assess the applications using the uniform rating or scoring system established by each awarding agency.
A common format is a peer review panel of at least three people, who assess and score each application independently. Then, the peer review panel will convene to discuss the merits of the applications. A series of policies and assurances are in place to maintain a fair, objective process based on material facts in the applications and without conflicts of interest (COI) for the peer reviewers. The federal agency staff monitor and participate in this review process.
While an application may have technical and programmatic quality, your budget also needs to be well-documented and reflect the requirements of the grant program. The federal agencies conduct a cost analysis, reviewing each line item and the overall proposed budget to ensure compliance with statutory and financial regulations. Additionally, the financial review also factors in the total budget for the grant program in relation to how much money each application requests.
Once the Federal agency completes the application review process, the Award Phase begins. The final award decisions rest solely in the hands of the federal agency staff with fiduciary responsibility and legal authority to enter binding agreements. Federal staff review and make award recommendations based on the programmatic and financial reviews of the applications. These recommendations are reviewed by a series of levels in the agencies to ensure high-quality, fair, and unbiased decisions.
Once the final award decisions are made, the awarding agency sends a Notice of Award (NOA) to the entities selected for funding. The NOA is the official, legally binding issuance of the award. When you or your organization accepts the grant (i.e., by signing the grant agreement or by drawing down funds) you become legally obligated to carry out the full terms and conditions of the grant.
As an award recipient, you are also subject to federal statutory and regulatory requirements and policies. Not sure what some of these policies are? Check out the Grant Policies section.
The post award phase comprises a significant amount of work over the duration of the award dates, which includes implementing the grant, reporting progress, and completing the closeout requirements. The federal agency that makes the award to you is also there to assist and ensure you or your organization complies with the grant terms and conditions. Your job is to faithfully and diligently carry out the grant program.
The agency monitors your progress and expenditures through various programmatic and financial reporting procedures, as well as using performance metrics per the grant agreement. While the majority of award recipients carry out the grants ethically and efficiently, these monitoring procedures are necessary to maintain transparency and to prevent fraud and abuse.
The awarding agency typically has a grants management officer and program officer designated to each grant, both of which you will work with throughout the life of the grant. They are the ones who will review reports and conduct site visits, so we recommend you build an effective line of communication with these staff members. It is better to prevent issues by talking to your grant and program officers to clarify grant terms or expectations than it is to submit a report and wait for problems to be identified and recourse initiated.
The specific reporting requirements, schedules, and systems can vary for each grant, so please review the grant terms and conditions carefully for this information. Check out the Grant Systems section to learn more about the systems you may have to use and where to find more information about them.
Federal grant-making agencies and grant recipients are audited. The Government Accountability Office (GAO), Office of Inspector General (OIG), and various departments within each Federal agency monitor and analyze policies, expenditures, and more activities within each grant-making agency. These same entities, as well as others, also monitor and analyze the performance of grant recipients.
The Federal awarding agency ensures non-Federal entities have a single audit conducted and submit a single audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) in a timely manner. The Federal awarding agency also performs follow-up on audit findings to ensure the non-Federal entity takes appropriate and timely corrective action. As part of this process, the Federal awarding agency issues a management decision, within six months of FAC acceptance of the audit report, for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to non-Federal entities.
A non-Federal entity that expends $750,000 or more in Federal awards during its fiscal year may be required to have a single audit conducted for that year. This audit is in lieu of any financial audit of Federal awards, which a non-Federal entity is required to undergo under any other Federal statute or regulation. After completion of the audit, the non-Federal entity submits the audit reporting package to the FAC within nine months after the end of the audit period. The non-Federal entity also performs follow-up and corrective action on all audit findings.
The closeout step is where the grant process ends. In order to complete a closeout, you, the award recipient, must submit the final financial and programmatic reports. According to the OMB Uniform Grants Guidance §200.343, the receipt must submit all financial, performance, and other reports required under the grant within 90 days after the grant award expires or is terminated. The awarding agency will review these reports to ensure compliance will all the grant terms and conditions as well as to make sure you spent all the funds appropriately.
How do I know when a grant is officially over? The Federal awarding agency has to confirm that the recipient has completed all of the required grant work and all the applicable administrative tasks. Until the awarding agency confirms this, you are still responsible for fulfilling all the terms of the grant. The closeout process can take several months if there are financial concerns or questions to reconcile. Also, if you or your organization acquired any property using grant funding, the closeout step is when you must make sure to handle this property exactly as the grant stipulates, which includes completing the appropriate reports on this property. Lastly, you are typically required to retain your grant records for at least three years from the date of the final expenditure report.
The grant process encompasses a lot of steps that are completed by different groups. Below is a checklist of the main steps in this process with links to more detailed information on each one.
Billions of dollars in Federal grants are awarded each year for programs and projects that benefit the public. This assistance is rooted in the Constitution and its call to « promote the general Welfare. »
It wasn’t until the 1970’s, however, that Federal grant policy began to evolve into what it is today. In the 70’s, Congressional lawmakers responded to reports that Federal agencies were using assistance awards, or grants, to pay for services. In doing so, they could side-step competition and procurement rules normally associated with government contracting.
The Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act, passed in 1977, set out to guide government agencies in their use of Federal funds – particularly by defining the roles of contracts, cooperative agreements, and grants. Contracts, the law states, should be awarded when a Federal agency is acquiring something – an improved computer network, for example. Grants and cooperative agreements, meanwhile, should be awarded when a Federal agency is providing assistance, such as funding for a lower-income housing program in an at-risk urban community.
To help with the implementation of the law, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published guidance in 1978 directing agencies to ensure that grants funds be used only for assistance-based programs and projects.
Since the 1970’s, subsequent grant-related legislation has helped to further develop Federal grant policy. It works much like it did in 1977 and 1978: Congress creates the grant-related laws and regulations.
The Executive Office of the President – of which OMB is part – helps to implement the laws through Executive Orders and Guidance that define administrative rules.
Finally, the grant-making agencies create internal and external policies and procedures based on the OMB guidance. (See chart.) These agency-specific policies for award recipients do not carry the weight of law, though they may be required of award recipients if they are listed in the Notice of Award.
When a new law is added to the books, that is only the beginning.
| Legal Hierarchy | Key Roles | Example |
| STAGE 1 Statutes Regulations |
Congress appropriates funds to Federal agencies and passes other grant-related legislation | 2014: Congress passes DATA Act, which directs that all Federal award data be accessible to the public on a single website |
| STAGE 2 Executive Orders Memoranda Circulars |
Executive Office of the President issues guidance for implementing the legislation | 2015: Executive Office of the President creates task force and launches pilot program to determine how DATA Act will be implemented |
| STAGE 3 Administrative Policies & Procedures |
Grant-making agencies develop administrative policies based on guidance | 2017: Agencies adjust their internal and external policies to the final guidance issued by the Executive Office of the President |
Other legislation has addressed everything from lobbying efforts to auditing requirements, to reporting procedures, to transparency and cross-agency data-sharing.
The OMB – along with other bodies – has continued to play an important role in interpreting and implementing the laws among the Federal government’s awarding agencies. Today’s current grant policies have been largely shaped by a range of statutes, regulations, Executive Orders and guidance.
To learn more about current grant policies, click below for summaries of the laws and their intended impact, beginning with the most recent:
Determining whether you are eligible to apply for and receive a federal grant is very important. If you are not legally eligible for a specific funding opportunity, you would waste a lot of time and money completing the application process when you cannot actually receive the grant.
When considering eligibility, the first step is to know what type of organization you represent (or whether you are applying as an individual). If you already know whether you will apply on behalf of your organization or as an individual, then you are ready to check your eligibility.
There are many types of organizations generally eligible to apply for funding opportunities on Grants.gov. Each type of organization listed in the categories below is a specific search criterion in Search Grants. Individual applicants are welcome too!
Small business grants may be awarded to companies meeting the size standards established by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) for most industries in the economy.
Individual people may submit applications for a funding opportunity on their own behalf (i.e., not on behalf of a company, organization, institution, or government). If you are registered with only an individual applicant profile, you are only allowed to apply to funding opportunities that are open to individuals.
Most of the funding opportunities on Grants.gov are for organizations, not individuals. If you are looking for personal financial assistance or other types of funding, check out the Grant Programs section to learn about how to find other forms of funding from the government.
The authorizing legislation and agency policies will determine whether a foreign individual or organization may apply for the grant. Foreign applicants need to complete the same registration process as domestic applicants, but there are additional steps to this registration process.
Depending on the intended usage of the grant you are applying for, you may need to file a U.S. tax return which requires a Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), also referred to as an employer Identification Number (EIN). If a non-resident alien is awarded funding to perform activities outside the United States, then this likely does not constitute U.S. source income and a TIN/EIN is not necessary. Examples of such funding include scholarships, fellowship grants, targeted grants, and achievement awards.
Before applying, foreign applicants should thoroughly review the IRS website and search for their most recent guidance for Aliens and International Taxpayers.
The grants community is diverse, and so is the terminology we use to talk about roles and aspects of the grants lifecycle. Here is a glossary of grant terms based on the Grant Policies and Grants.gov functionality.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
The convenient e-Government initiative of Grants.gov provides access to information about federal grant-making agencies. If you would like to learn more about grant programs specific to these agencies, please click on the agency name below:
The Agency for International Development is an independent federal government agency that provides economic and humanitarian assistance in more than 100 countries to ensure a better future for us all. (https://www.usaid.gov)
The Corporation for National and Community Service is the nation’s largest grant-maker supporting service and volunteering. Through Senior Corps, AmeriCorps and the Learn and Serve America programs, the Corporation is a catalyst for change and offers every American a chance to contribute through service and volunteering. (https://www.nationalservice.gov)
Established in 1862, the Department of Agriculture serves all Americans through anti-hunger efforts, through stewardship of nearly 200 million acres of national forest and rangelands, and through product safety and conservation efforts. The USDA opens markets for American farmers and ranchers and provides food for needy people around the world. (https://www.usda.gov)
The Department of Commerce fosters and promotes the nation’s economic development and technological advancement through vigilance in international trade policy, domestic business policy and growth, and promoting economic progress at all levels. (https://www.commerce.gov)
The Department of Defense provides the military forces needed to deter war and protect the security of the United States through five major areas: peacekeeping and war-fighting efforts, Homeland Security, evacuation and humanitarian causes. (http://www.dod.gov)
The Department of Education ensures equal access to education and promotes educational excellence through coordination, management, and accountability in federal education programs. The Department works to supplement and complement educational efforts on all levels, encouraging increased involvement by the public, parents and students. (https://www.ed.gov)
The Department of Energy’s goal is to advance national, economic, and energy security in the U.S.; to promote scientific and technological innovation in support of that goal; and to ensure environmental cleanup of the national nuclear weapons complex. (http://www.energy.gov)
The Department of Health and Human Services is the federal government’s principal agency for protecting the health of all Americans and providing essential human services, especially to those who are least able to help themselves. (https://www.hhs.gov)
The Department of Homeland Security has three primary missions: Prevent terrorist attacks within the United States, reduce America’s vulnerability to terrorism and minimize the damage from potential attacks and natural disasters. (https://www.dhs.gov)
The Department of Housing and Urban Development’s mission is to increase homeownership, support community development and increase access to affordable housing free from discrimination. HUD fulfills this mission through high ethical standards, management, and accountability, and by forming partnerships with community organizations. (http://www.hud.gov)
The Department of the Interior protects and provides access to the nation’s natural and cultural heritage, including responsibilities to Indian tribes and island communities. Departmental goals include resource protection and usage, overseeing recreational opportunities, serving communities, and excellence in management. (https://www.doi.gov)
The Department of Justice enforces the law and defends the interest of the United States, ensuring public safety against threats foreign and domestic; providing federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; seeking just punishment for those guilty of unlawful pursuits; and ensuring fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. (https://www.usdoj.gov)
The Department of Labor fosters and promotes the welfare of job seekers, wage earners and retirees by improving their working conditions, advancing their opportunities, protecting their retirement and health benefits, and generally protecting worker rights and monitoring national economic measures. (https://www.dol.gov)
The Department of State strives to create a more secure, democratic and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community. (https://www.state.gov)
The Department of Transportation’s mission is to ensure fast, safe, efficient, accessible, and convenient transportation that meets vital national interests and enhances the quality of life of the American people, today and into the future. (https://www.dot.gov)
The Department of Treasury is a steward of United States economic and financial systems, promotes conditions for prosperity and stability in the U.S., and encourages prosperity and stability in the rest of the world. (https://www.treasury.gov)
The Department of Veterans Affairs strives for excellence in patient care and veteran’s benefits for its constituents through high-quality, prompt, and seamless service to United States veterans. (https://www.va.gov)
The mission of the Environmental Protection Agency is to protect human health and the environment. Since 1970, the EPA has been working for a cleaner, healthier environment for the American people. (https://www.epa.gov)
The Institute of Museum and Library Services is the primary source of federal support for the nation’s 122,000 libraries and 17,500 museums. The Institute serves as a leader in providing services to enhance learning, sustain cultural heritage, and increase civic participation. (https://www.imls.gov)
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration serves as the nation’s forefront of such exploration and continues to pioneer in aeronautics, exploration systems, science, and space operations. (https://www.nasa.gov)
The National Archives and Records Administration enables people to inspect the record of what the federal government has done, enables officials and agencies to review their actions, and helps citizens hold them accountable. (https://www.archives.gov)
The National Endowment for the Arts is a public agency dedicated to supporting excellence in the arts, bringing the arts to all Americans, and providing leadership in arts education. The Endowment is the largest national source of funds for the arts. (http://www.nea.gov)
The National Endowment for the Humanities is an independent grant-making agency of the United States government dedicated to supporting research, education, preservation, and public programs in the humanities. (https://www.neh.gov)
The National Science Foundation is an independent federal agency created to promote the progress of science, to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare, and to secure the national defense. The NSF annually funds approximately 20 percent of basic, federally-supported college and university research. (https://www.nsf.gov)
The Small Business Administration maintains and strengthens the nation’s economy by aiding, counseling, assisting, and protecting the interests of small businesses, and by helping families and businesses recover from national disasters. (https://www.sba.gov)
The Social Security Administration advances the economic security of the nation’s people through compassionate and vigilant leadership in shaping and managing America’s Social Security programs. (https://www.ssa.gov)
The following systems and tools are involved in the registration, application, and reporting processes connected to federal awards. (Note: This is not an exhaustive list. Please email support@grants.gov to request that another federal system or tool be added.)
ASAP, or the Automated Standard Application for Payments, is a platform through which award recipients and federal agencies may process grant payment requests and handle disbursement reporting activities.
The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) CAGE Code website provides a standalone solution to search for foreign and domestic entities’ CAGE information.
DisasterAssistance.gov is a resource for citizens impacted by a disaster. The website provides information about support and services, and it is also a channel through which entities may apply for financial assistance.
The Dun & Bradstreet Government iUpdate tool allows applicants to look-up or request a unique DUNS number, which is required when registering on Grants.gov.
The National Institute of Health’s (NIH) electronic Research Administration systems support grant processing for applicants, award recipients, and federal staff.
The Federal Procurement Data System is a searchable repository of data related to government procurement and contracts. Some federal agencies also publish financial assistance data to the system.
The grants management solutions developed by The Grants Center of Excellence (COE) serve both grant-making agencies as well as applicants and award recipients.
Interagency Edison is a portal through which grant recipients and contractors report to their funding agency about inventions created with government funds.
The Internet Data Entry System is the channel through which federal award recipients submit their single audit reporting packages to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
The CAGE Code is assigned to organizations (e.g., manufacturers, distributors, etc.) to facilitate the supply chain. The NATO Codification System (NCS) differentiates between the U.S. and NATO systems, so CAGE was referred to as NCAGE in the NCS community.
The Payment Management System, like ASAP, is a platform that handles the grant payment requests and disbursement reporting activities of grant recipients and grant-making agencies.
Research.gov serves the research community by providing access to important information, thus streamlining business processes among partner agencies.
The System for Awards Management is a free platform through which entities applying to receive awards from the U.S. Federal Government must register.
This will be the official U.S. government website for people who make, receive, and manage federal awards. Includes descriptions of federal assistance listings, each of which is associated with a Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number.
The Tracking Accountability in Government Grants System warehouses over 20 years of HHS grant-award program data, and it is designed to facilitate the public and private sector constituent’s understanding of the work, availability, benefits, and trends in HHS-facilitated public investment.
USASpending.gov is a single, searchable website accessible to the public listing information about every Federal award, as required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) of 2006.
If you are just entering the realm of grants and government funding, it can feel overwhelming trying to find the right program for you or your organization. When considering grants, these programs can be broadly categorized as those awarded by the federal government and those awarded by non-federal entities. Within these two categories are a variety of funding sources and program types.
To sort through the federal grant programs, the authoritative source is the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA). This catalog lists all of the available funding programs to all levels of government, nonprofit organizations, for-profit businesses, and other eligible entities. Search Grants within Grants.gov allows you to search, filter, and apply for specific opportunities to receive funding from one of these programs.
There are a large number of nonprofit organizations and for-profit businesses that also provide grants or other types of funding assistance.
Note: The information below is not exhaustive, and Grants.gov is not affiliated with, nor endorsing, any of these resources. They are provided as a convenience to prospective grant applicants.
The Foundation Center
maintains a comprehensive database on U.S. and global grant-makers and their funding opportunities. It also operates research, education, and training programs designed to advance knowledge of philanthropy at every level.
The Funding Information Network
facilitates access to grant resources and publications to under-resourced entities and populations.
State and regional directories can also be found with some research. Try using the Community Foundation Locator
to find a grant-making foundation in your region. You may also use your preferred web search engine to find your state’s grant or foundation directory. Local libraries may have access to subscription-based search engines or the Foundation Center Cooperating Collections, so visit your library to work with them for assistance.
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) defines federal grants management as work that « involves implementing and managing federal grants and cooperative agreements and providing grants-related assistance and services. »
To prepare employees and prospective employees for grant-related career paths, the federal government has developed a range of tools and assets. If you are considering a career in federal grants management, or if you are hoping to add related skillsets to your resume, we encourage you to consult the following resources after familiarizing yourself with the Grants 101 section of the Grants Learning Center:
OPM’s position flysheet for grants management contains example tasks, including administering grants, designing grant policy, and serving as liaison between the government and external parties.
The Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Council identified functional competencies that are standard performance requirements for individuals working in federal financial assistance management.
Grants Management Online Training Course: The CFO Council has developed an online course for government employees and grant professionals hoping to work in federal financial assistance management.
Financial Assistance Management Career Roadmap: This interactive resource from the CFO Council supports the grants management workforce to identify and learn about key competencies to continue their professional development.
Federal Financial Management Career Roadmap: This interactive resource was developed by the CFO Council to support the professional development of federal financial management professionals.
In 2006, the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) set in motion a government-wide reporting procedure that has continued to evolve.
The law requires that information about entities and organizations receiving federal funds be disclosed to the public via a central website, USAspending.gov. This information currently includes the entity’s name, amount of the grant, funding agency, and location – among other requirements – and is published by the grant-making agency on USASpending.gov.
The federal award recipient – called the « prime awardee » by FFATA – files progress reports via the FFATA Sub-award Reporting System (FSRS).
Sub-recipients – those entities receiving sub-grants – submit data to the prime awardee. (Those sub-recipients with awards of $25,000 or more must have their data shared by the prime awardee through FSRS.)
The following chart lays out this process in a linear format: Sub-awardees give their reporting data to prime awardees; prime awardees submit all required data via FSRS; and federal grant-making agencies publish program data on USASpending.gov.
| Making Sense of the Grant Reporting Process | ||||
| Sub-awardees give their reporting data to prime awardees. | → | Prime awardees submit all required data via FSRS. | → | Federal grant-making agencies publish program data on USASpending.gov. |
What kinds of data are federal award recipients expected to include in their reporting?
The information falls into one of three categories: financial data, such as expenses paid for with federal funds; compliance information to ensure the recipient is following federal regulations; and project data highlighting progress and/or community impact.
Grant-making agencies use this information, in part, to gauge the success of their own programs and initiatives.
The required information may be collected through several different channels, including regular progress reports, site visits, and audits (see table below).
| Progress Reports | Site Visits & Technical Assistance | Audits |
| Grant recipients submit regular reports (called « Performance Progress Reports » or « Research Performance Progress Reports ») documenting a project throughout its lifespan.These reports may include both expense-related data and quantitative information about the project’s impact. | Grant recipients may receive site visits from the federal grantor agency. Such visits provide an opportunity for two-way communication between the grantor and the award recipient.Technical assistance provided by the grantor is also a means for ensuring that the grant recipient is complying with the award agreement. | The Single Audit Act (amended in 1996) states that grant recipients may be subject to an audit once a year.The audit aims to ensure compliance with government regulations and evaluate financial information, including expenses paid for with federal award funds. |
Sources: FSRS.gov, Office of Management and Budget, Introduction to Grants and Cooperative Agreements for Federal Personnel
, Department of Transportation, Corner Alliance
, Third Sector Today ![]()
Every year, hundreds of billions of dollars are distributed in the form of federal grants to universities, local governments, organizations and individuals.
The vast majority of these funds are spent as intended, but misuse, deceit and abuse are nonetheless present. As a result, hundreds of thousand dollars go to waste.
Fraudulent behavior can take the form of embezzlement, theft, bribery or false claims and statements. Such violations of federal law are difficult to flag without the help of individuals inside the grant community.
Learn how you can help to stop fraudulent behavior and, thus, strengthen the integrity of the federal grant system and increase the overall efficiency of the government.
Grant fraud typically occurs when award recipients attempt to deceive the government about their spending of award money. Such behavior amounts to « lying, cheating and stealing, » according to the Department of Justice.
The allure of so-called « free money » from the federal government has enabled scam artists to prey on people’s hopes by promising access to grants – often for a fee. In reality, federal grants are rarely awarded to individuals seeking personal benefits, and applying for a grant is completely free.
Besides triggering lost efficiency and waste in the government, grant fraud can also have a significant impact on entities found to have carried it out. The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General warns that consequences can include « debarment from receiving future funding, administrative recoveries of funds, civil law suits and criminal prosecution. »
Federal Inspectors General (IG) within each government agency have been established as independent and objective units tasked with combating waste, fraud, and abuse in their respective programs.
Only with your help! The front line of defense against fraudulent behavior in the grant community includes accountants, auditors and other award recipient personnel.
Depuis 7 ans, nous nous attelons à vous offrir une information de qualité sans parti pris.
Soyez le premier à commenter